Magic, Mystery Religions, and Psychology

Freud-and-Jung
Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung

The entrance of psychological concepts into Witchcraft and Occulture in general has not gone unnoticed. For example, interpretations on certain Tarot decks or explaining the existence of Gods and spirits in a mental way (that is, that these forces are merely constructs within our subconscious). These psychological explanations seem to soften our religious practices and attune them to the “educated,” rather than others. But how did it begin? What forces were invoked to dilute the Occult in this manner?

Occultism
The word “occultism” (things that are hidden) came about in the 19th century among French metaphysical orders. Prior to that the groups of Natural Magic, Astrology, and Alchemy were referred to as the “occult sciences,” in an attempt to make them compatible with modern science. Many scientists and philosophers in the late Middle Ages, Renaissance, and Baroque periods held onto occult beliefs and practices such as Sir Isaac Newton, Marsilio Ficino, Paracelsus, Leonardo da Vinci, Johann Friedrich Schweitzer, and Franz Kessler (among others).

Occult sciences were studied in Arabic, Italian, French, German, Spanish, and English countries. The spread of the occult sciences to these regions blossomed from its roots in Near Eastern sources such as Egypt, Iran, Iraq, and the Byzantine period prior to its conquest by the Islamic Turks. Yet it was the work of the Islamic Caliphate Empire that provided the means to copy and preserve occult writings from the past and protect them in their libraries. It was the passing on of certain Hermetic, Neoplatonic, and Gnostic works into Italy by way of the Islamic Empire that spawned the Italian Renaissance. This Renaissance in turn took root in the countries aforementioned.

The German Occult Revival and Theosophy
The Austrian Empire, Germany, Prussia, and the German States had their own Occult Revival beginning in the 19th century but with roots going back to the 12th century Knights Templar. A movement known as the Rosicrucian (“Rose Cross”) Movement flourished in the 17th and 18th centuries. Later in 1884 a branch of Theosophy was established. Theosophy (“Divine Wisdom”) is a non-sectarian philosophical branch which has influenced the works of many Occult authors and esoteric orders. This organization’s founders saw themselves as investigators of Truth and also a bridge between West and East.

Note: It was during this time – and earlier – that India was under the dominion of the British Empire. British spiritual seekers traveled to India and Sri Lanka to gain “older” occult currents into their spiritual and magical systems. India was a fascinating place. Keep in mind that Church and State were (are) inseparable in the Empire, and therefore the history the English learned was that of a literal Bible interpretation for history. When indigenous tribes were “discovered” in the Americans, Australia, the Pacific Islands, East Asia, and the Indian Subcontintent, British scientists and travelers wanted to know how these “exotic and noble savages” lived their loves with morals and yet without the Bible. There were also discoveries that these lands had civilizations older than the 6,000 year history the British Church taught; many of these were later hidden from the general public until the late 20th century.

As the German Occult Revival went underway, an unfortunate turn of events slowly changed the direction of German Occultism from one of openness to one of nationalism, misinterpreting Gnostic texts – such as that the Jews were evil because their God, Yahweh (the Demiurge) was also evil. As well, early anthropological studies began using the term “Aryan” for the ancestors of Europeans, Iranians, and Indians. This word was ingrained as a call for nationalism among “White Aryans” to band together and restore “the superior race.”

The French Occult Revival
As the German Occult Revival was underway, another movement was being birthed in France during the mid-19th century. One of the men (or perhaps the main one) responsible for the revival of Occultism was a gentleman by the name of Alphonse Louis Constant; better known by his esoteric name Eliphas Levi.

Eliphas was a Qabalist and socialist. His magical studies helped him to see how socialism – as a reaction against an empire of monarchs – was also a place one could easily discuss magical subjects. His Qabalistic ideals and magical inquiries were shaped by his socialist circles. Levi began to work in Dream Magic, Qabala, Magnetism, and Ceremonial Magic. He published his “History of Magic” in 1861. Levi attempted to define just what Magic was/is. His work with the Tarot was influential with other Occult Orders, such as the Esoteric Order of the Golden Dawn. It was also Levi who gave us the modern and most famous image of Baphomet, the “Sabbatic Goat” of Witchcraft and the utmost symbolism of the Absolute:

Baphomet
Levi’s Baphomet

The Libido and the Psychoanalysis of the Mind and of Magic
Enter Sigmund Freud in all of this hullabaloo. The atmosphere was rife with occult imagery, orders, and philosophies. Freud had a hatred for the occult sciences. However, the psychoanalysis he gave to women and other patients at the time made sexual energy (“libido”) the main focus of their diagnosis and subsequent treatment. He interpreted otherwise paranormal phenomenon as nothing more than expressions of the libido. For example, in a conversation with his student Carl Jung, he said:

You see, we must make a dogma of it, an unshakable bulwark…Against the black tide of mud, of occultism.

And although he said this and expressed hatred for the occult sciences, nonetheless Freud did have some interest in it himself. For example, Freud and a friend visited a German psychic named Frau Seidler who lived in Berlin.

Although Freud was following his school of thought, it was his pupil Carl Jung who really made an impact on Occulture. He had a lifelong fascination and even wrote treatises on his alleged theories. He departed from the sexual hypotheses of Freud and embraced a more spiritual connection. Jung believed in the paranormal and Occult. He participated in seances and spent time with prominent spiritualists such as Douglas Home, the renowned Spiritualist who could levitate his body.

But what Jung is most famous is for is his theories on the Collective Unconscious, Archetypes, and transpersonal psychology (he coined the term transpersonal). He studied dreams in individuals and noted that there was a collective thought. This collective, he hypothesized, spoke in “universal symbols” and fashioned what he called archetypes. For example, there was the “universal meaning” of mother-child, father-child, the Shadow, the wise old man, the hunter, and the Hero. These, he felt, were important additions to occult psychology: how correspondences in Magic were seen as the same as the Collective.

Magic as a Psychological Pursuit
Due to these discoveries, many occultists adopted these Jungian tropes and transferred it over to Magic. Instead of ritual and personal growth in Magical skills such as astral projection, summoning spirits, interacting with the spirits of our world, worshiping deities, and making inner connections to other Magical endeavors, people began writing and saying that these performances were all in the Mind: the Mindscape where all repositories of Dream Symbol and Dream Language exist. This has caused a lot of chaos in Magic, most especially for people who desire a spiritual connection, not just a mental exercise.

Spirits and Gods began to be viewed as constructs of the Mindscape, and therefore did not need worship or careful precautions. Exorcisms were explained as the individual forming a negative image in their mind and then using that image and psychological language to “force the Shadow out,” and integrate the lesson with the positivity of Light. In fact, the New Age Movement has incorporated so much of this information.

“Pathworkings” with fantastical meditations were used. Also, the introduction of “What does this mean to you,” rather than Mystery Traditions who kept a common framework for their own meaning in order to secure the egregore. The egregore is a psychic elemental who watches over the coven, lodge, or grove and steers it and its people towards the Work. It comes from the word Grigori, or “Watcher.”

Accountability in spiritual and Magical matters were thrown aside, and more people joined Witchcraft and Neopagansim because of its penchant to not be heavy in doctrine and be an “anything goes” scenario. While I encourage individual workings because we are all different, and we all engage with spirits and deities differently, nonetheless the influence of Jung and psychology into the Craft and Polytheism really made a disservice. People no long wanted to be taught the Old Ways, opting instead for personal flavorings of deities and spirits who “they liked.”

Conclusion
Magic is not psychological. Divination is not psychological. The Mysteries are not psychological. They will have an impact on the Mind (psyche), but it isn’t the same thing. It is for these reasons that many Occultists and polytheists are returning to the ways which predate the psychological intervention of our worship and Magics. Neopagans as a whole have adopted many New Age concepts and language, focusing on self-development as opposed to seeing self-development as an effect of Magic, and not the reason for it.

Magic is real. It takes time and training. Correspondences are for knowing the realm of each spirit, not for you to build up your mind so you can feel better about what you’re doing. Magic is dark and light. Worship is a must. Training and passing on the ways of our people to the next generation are important. Education is fundamental.

Eirene kai Hugieia!
(Peace and Health!)
Oracle

 

 

Return from Hiatus: Polytheist Leadership Conference and Other Goings-On

My model of Hekate
Hekate

Hi all,

This blog has been quiet for awhile, and I’d like to apologize to all of my readers for that. It’s been a tough few months for myself, both financially, spiritually, and physically. Just as a reminder, I suffer with a traumatic right brain injury and all of the side effects that come with it, including epilepsy. I was on one medication, but it seemed to have exacerbated some nasty stuff like vivid hallucinations. In addition, I had 2 or 3 episodes. So now I am weaning off of that one and starting on a new one. Taking both are currently affecting my energy levels, but still I intend to restart my blogging. I need to. Writing is my creative and cathartic outlet for many things, and also my way of remaining in touch with the goings-on of the blog-o-sphere. In addition, I get to share any major events happening in my side of the country as well as with my Temple.

For starters, the Summer Solstice came and went. It was magnificent. Our Temple honored Dionysus Dendritos and the Nymphai. The Solstice is significant in that it signals in our Calendar the end of the Bull Half of the Year and the start of the Wolf Half. That is, the Great Festivals give way from cultus to Dionysus to Hekate. Our Temple is named after Her, after all: Temple of Hekate: Ordo Sacra Strix. So I’ll be writing more about Hekate and how we at the Temple honor cultus to Her in forthcoming blogs.

Our Bomos during our Summer Solstice Festivities.
Our Bomos during our Summer Solstice Festivities.

Polytheist Leadership Conference
Now, as some of you may recall, I was trying to attend the Polytheist Leadership Conference which took place this past July 11 – 13. I missed out on it and told Sannion as such that I would. Sadly, I had other things to attend to. It would have wonderful had I been able to join this historic Inaugural setting, but I’ll work on ensuring that attend future conferences as best as I am able. In the meantime I have this blog. But from what I’ve been reading, it was excellent. You can read about the goings-on in the following areas:

Sannion doesn’t talk about any specific details of the Conference as of yet, but there are some tidbits in a question raised by someone following the Conference. You can read it here.

Galina Krasskova kept some continuous updates at her blog here. Just scroll down and take your pick, folks. There’s a lot to take in, as there should be. I’m jealous.

The Thracian will have some follow-ups coming along at his blog here.

PSLV (aka Lupus), as always, has detailed journalistic entries here. As with Galina’s, scroll down and take your pick. I’m salivating and very sad that I couldn’t attend. “Next time,” I keep telling myself. “Next time.”

Finally, Ruadhan McElroy pens some interesting experiences here and here.

I’m positive there are many more links and blogs talking about the Conference, but since these I follow I figure I’ll post them here. Like you all, I will be following in the days to come.

Impact
What are the ramifications from the Conference? What is it that we, as a people, are being asked to do? What have those who have gone and set themselves up as leaders of Polytheism planning to come forth with in the coming days, months and years? What are the plans for our respective Communities? Do we who did not attend agree on major points, or are there points to disagree on? Now, with the latter questions I tend to try and be careful on, because I’ve had my fair share of criticisms with people who are “armchair debaters.” They feel it is their task to not do anything at all while others do a lot of hard work. And then, they sit back and critique everything down to the last iota. Yet they never contributed anything. I’d hate to be viewed as one of those people, because I didn’t attend. But, we all have voices, and I take a small comfort in that my Work here with my Temple may be enough to let me have some allowance. I also consider myself pretty objective, yet passionate about my views. I don’t tend to take sides in debates very easily, but neither do I make the mistake of always seeing a “third road.” Sometimes the middle way is no way at all, and a side must be taken. Anyway, enough said. I say all of that to say this:

Lupus brought up something interesting, which I’ll quote some of it here. Hopefully it will not be taken out of context. For the full blog, please go here, where he posts a follow-up regarding the Thracian’s appearance on Wyrd Ways Radio. Here’s the issue/question/matter:

And the question is this: have we created a “polytheist echo chamber”? Despite our many disagreements, there is a great deal that we do agree on, and that we have found “unity” of purpose over as a result of all this. That’s a great and powerful thing, and in fact it’s the origin of the term “syncretism,” which I’m unsurprisingly in favor of heavily–!?!–and yet, Fox News is an echo chamber, and various other groups that are not looked on very charitably (with good reason!) are also echo chambers.

Are we at all in danger of becoming an echo chamber? While I don’t think so, realistically, I know that our newfound sense of common purpose and our enjoyment at having had such a great experience will likely prompt those of our critics who already find us distasteful and erroneous for various reasons to say that we’re only interested in our own opinions and hearing them agreed with and supported by like-minded folks. (And that makes us different to EVERYONE ELSE how, exactly?)

I’m beginning to move to the point of thinking that Wicca, Christianity, and all of these other things are perfectly fine for themselves, because they’re entirely different religions than our own. That is obvious, needless to say. I think that it might be more necessary, though, for us as modern polytheists to withdraw from the wider pagan community and umbrella in various ways because our religion and theological viewpoints are so vastly different to most of those, which will then allow us to preserve our autonomy and not be interfered with by their wishes for our conformity. If they can begin to see us as different religions, rather than as being under their umbrella, then there will be no reason for them to try and regulate our rhetoric, our practices, or anything else, in the same way that Hindus don’t do that and pagans don’t do it to Hindus, Buddhists don’t do that and pagans don’t do it to Buddhists, and some Christians don’t do that and pagans don’t (usually) do it to Christians, even though some of them do and would like to on both sides of that issue…

I don’t know…what do you all think?

Polytheist Religions
I don’t think there is any one simple response to this, as I don’t think there should be. What Lupus is asking is very relevant, and something that everyone should be careful of: the dreaded Group Think. Everyone starts to feel like they are so like-minded that suddenly the group becomes a place where ideas and innovations stagnate in the face of hardened dogma, and there lies a potential danger even for historically reconstructed Polytheist groups. Thankfully there are questioning Dionysians like myself who love nothing more than to enter an echo chamber and cause a little mayhem and chaos in order for people to see the systems which they have in place will always contain a flaw of some kind, and it’s necessary at times to ensure especially when Old Systems need to die for New Systems to arise. That’s just the cycle of energy: evolution and entropy. In my Temple, our teachings tend to illustrate this cycle between the Forces of Aphrodite and Ares: Love and Strife. In order for Creation to occur, Aphrodite brings forth Desire for the Four Elements to dance in rhythmic Harmony. This rhythmic Harmony is at the heart of all things. But lest matter implode upon itself, Ares must come forth and wield His weapon to separate the Elements into their pure states. However, by separating them into their pure states, destruction of matter occurs. It’s a constant flux and flow dance.

I say all of that to say this: I think there’s a flaw. Lupus groups all Polytheist religions beneath one umbrella in and of itself, when in reality that isn’t very simple. For example, taking the term by itself, Polytheism can be found among Christians and Wiccans. But I guess since most official denominations regard themselves as monotheist, perhaps we can’t include them? I don’t know. It seems weird that we ourselves (or perhaps me) can’t study some Christian denominations like Mormonism and Catholicism and say, “Yeah, despite what they say they are Polytheist.” I mean, we study other cultural faiths and do it all of the time. I don’t think Western religions should be exempt just because they try and say otherwise. Traditional Wicca, for the record, isn’t a religion. It’s a priesthood of initiates dedicated to specific tribal Gods and spirits of those Traditions. Neo-Wicca is a vastly different creature, but I don’t think I have space for that right now. I’m trying to focus on Lupus’ question, and giving an answer that I’m sure plenty will disagree with. Honestly, I’m okay with that! I really hope people do, because we need honest dialogue about these kinds of things. Now, while perhaps the vast majority (I’m guessing) of Polytheist-labeled faiths group themselves as “historically accurate,” there may be Temples and groups which will rise up and revive the worship of the Old Gods in their own way. There may not be any historical precedent for what they do, but they may claim to be Polytheist nonetheless.

As an example, many cults and groups of Sanatana Dharma (or what we Westerners call “Hinduism”) are considered more orthodox in their approach to the Vedas and other Scriptures. But there are cults and groups that fall under the umbrella of polytheism, henotheism, etc. within Hinduism and yet may not be considered “orthodox” by the majority. There may be gurus or saints that have their own revelations about the Gods, their own teachings about how they approach them, and so forth. (I need to stop here and say I honestly hope I am making sense and that I didn’t make a mistake in my insomnia to type this at 4am and it’s all gibberish). I guess what I’m trying to say is that I think rather than pull completely away from Neo-Paganism, we should find ways to have our own dialogues with our local Communities which may include Neo-Pagans. The problem I think is that Neo-Pagans have had a start since the 1960s, so inevitably now they are going to host gatherings under their label, whether large or small. But as Polytheist-labeled groups can start their own momentum, we need not exclude anyone. We can have our Conferences, Festivals and Workshops and be inclusive as well. We’re siblings anyway, worshiping the same or similar Gods but perhaps in vastly different ways. Not all Neo-Pagans are Deists, just as not all Polytheists are historically accurate. There are still some people, such as myself, who hold the label of a Neo-Pagan and a Polytheist. My Temple is labeled as Polytheist, however, because it’s important to distinguish that unlike the Neo-Wiccan groups in the area that are a venerable free-for-all, we carry structure, hierarchy and dogma. We even have our own set of sacred Scriptures that detail our own Mythology unique to our Temple. Thus, we are very different.

Getting Out from under the Umbrella
But just to make sure I’m saying something correct and not misreading, I agree with Lupus that insofar as the Greater Pagan Communities are concerned, there are organizations that tend to speak for the Communities as best as they are able (i.e. Pagan Pride, Cherry Hill Seminary, Circle Sanctuary, etc.), and they don’t speak for us. Or, speaking for myself, they don’t speak for me (I apologize to any Polytheist who enjoys those organizations and feels they do speak for them). We just need to be careful, I think, that again while having our own gatherings that we do not totally separate. It’s a precarious dance. Some of us, like I said, will walk in both worlds at the same time, being neither here nor there. Lupus in a blog entry described a brief presentation by the Thracian in which the latter spoke about regional cultus in modern polytheism. According to what I can gather (I’m sure more details will come later), the viewpoint that modern Polytheists can do is to look at different people, cults and Temples from how they worship Deities and if their approach to similar/same Deities are different, it’s because of regional variation. No one can speak for anyone. That’s how the ancient world practiced. We must keep in mind that Polytheism means plurality: a kaleidoscope worldview that makes room for many different universes and possibilities. For every fragment of the ancient world that has survived, perhaps hundreds are lost that we may never know of. We can never be truly sure how one person or group approaches the Gods is not an approved way. Neither can we speak for the Gods. Well, I can’t, short of blasphemy going on. Even though as an Oracle They choose to speak through me, I can’t just assume something. It doesn’t Work that way. I hate that.

Why All the Fuss?
If the aforementioned is true, then why all the fuss about rituals in Pagan Pride Day events? Why all of the kerfuffle when it comes to the differences between Polytheists and some Neo-Pagans? Here’s my honest answer, for what it’s worth: it’s because our ways are being questioned and threatened with exclusion, not the other way around. It’s because many Neo-Pagans desire Magick and to walk with the Gods, and yet when it’s in front of them, they fucking stomp on it because it doesn’t mesh with their semblance of reality. They only recognize it when they see pseudo-shamans who charge exorbitant amounts of cash for a weekend retreat to pound a few drums, paint their faces, find their Wolf/Bear/Eagle totem, and then suddenly they think they’re a fucking shaman. It’s because they don’t know the meaning of sacrifice – only reward. It’s because they think all rituals are the same, and everyone is the same, and we’re homogenized with them against our wishes. It’s because no one wants any controversy in the Pan-Pagan Movement. Traditional Wiccans get enough flack for being secretive and keeping their Mysteries to themselves. People want to come in, be a 3rd degree without any sincere training of what it means to touch the spirit world, and then claim a title without knowing just what that title entails. They see the gold tiara, not the thorns. They see the shiny fetishes as an excuse for their hoarding problem. They disrespect themselves, so how can they possibly respect the Unseen Powers they desire to know so much?

That’s why there is a fuss. I’ve said it once, and I’ll say it again: we are different cultures, different tribes, different peoples. We’re not all the same, and that’s okay. We need to have:

Unification in Diversity!!!

Fuck. I missed a great Conference.

Eirene kai Hugieia!
(Peace and Health!)
~Oracle~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploring Modern Pagan Ethics III: Witchcraft, Hexes and Cursing

cursetablet2
Phyrgian Curse Tablets (1st-3rd Century CE)

This is the final of my three-part series on modern Pagan Ethics, and I am seriously wondering if I should do any type of series in the future. I may, but right now I need to give a rant about some thing. But I’ll save that for my next blog entry. While I have discussed some of the misnomers about the Law of Three and the Wiccan Rede, it seems that many in the Neo-Wiccan camp insist on interpreting both principles as inviolate laws. They refuse to mingle with Witches (even those who are Traditional Wiccans) that profess they have zero issues with cursing and hexing, like we somehow have a disease that affects us. Or, worse, yet, that we carry “negative energy.”

You know what? Nature is positive and negative. We are fucking human, and we experience the range of emotions going from anger, to happiness, to sad, to bored, to extreme pissiness, to horny, to whatever else we have. Our sex tastes feature from gentle to rock-your-ass-clawing-biting-spit-blood-cum-in-your-face deal. We love our neighbors, and hate our neighbors. We love our families, and we hate our families. We feel love and betrayal. We feel injustice and the venom that can come from traumatic pasts or unsavory characters.

And yes, we carry negativity, because it’s called LIFE!

I have zero conflict about lending healing energy when someone needs it, and I have absolutely no conflict within me when I am betrayed, hurt or attacked to attack back. When someone does their absolute best to ruin my life or my reputation, I will pull out my arsenal, dig a pit to the Underworld, offer some blood, bury a tablet, and resort to eviscerating them in writing. That’s witchcraft; that’s magic.

I am a Witch, and a Wiccan. I honor the Dead and the Old Ones. I know how to channel and call up spirits for harm and healing. One of my Gods, Apollon, is the God whose arrows inflict both plague and healing. Hekate is my Goddess who rules the heavenly skies and the dread denizens at the crossroads. Dionysus calls down madness upon those who reject Him or offend His people. Whatever consequences I face from my actions, it’s upon my head. I know what the fuck I am doing, and the last thing I need is some wannabe witch telling me, “Oh but you’re going to surround yourself with negativity and don’t forget the Law of Three and Harm None!” Honestly, those words (or something similar) are all I need to figure out what kind of person I am dealing with. They have told me more than I ever need to know. And I pity the person who thinks that because I am Wiccan, I won’t resort to magic to get even.

Here’s the reality of the situation:

We all have ways we deal with conflict, betrayal, hurt and bad people. Sometimes the ways in which we are dealt are not fair. I don’t have a lot of money. I can’t afford lawyers. I struggle. My witchcraft is born because of the suffering I live. I think many American Neo-Wiccans are spoiled. While I think that there are many ways to deal with certain conflicts in a healthy manner, some things cannot. Bad employers discriminating against you? Someone suing you? Someone accusing you of something that you’re innocent of? Someone is threatening to take away your kids and leave you with nothing? Trust me, when your back is against the wall and you can’t think of a way out: magic. Hexing. Cursing.

I am a Witch, and I have no shame.

Eirene kai Hugieia!
(Peace and Health!)
~Oracle~